Cover image via China Press & New Straits TimesFollow us on Instagram, TikTok, and WhatsApp for the latest stories and breaking news.
When news broke that the lorry driver involved in the Sungai Petani crash that killed six members of the same family was released, many Malaysians were left wondering why
After all, the collision resulted in multiple fatalities, including a police corporal, and remains under active police investigation.
However, being released after a remand application is rejected does not automatically mean a person has been found innocent or that authorities have stopped investigating the case.
What happened?
Earlier today, 8 June, the Sungai Petani Magistrates' Court rejected a police application to remand the 49-year-old lorry driver involved in the crash at Kampung Baru Pinang Tunggal, Kedah.
According to Berita Harian, magistrate Mohamad Azlan Basri ordered the driver's release after police had completed recording his statement.
The driver had been detained shortly after the collision as part of the investigation process.
What is a remand order?
A remand order allows police to keep a suspect in custody for a longer period while investigations are ongoing.
However, police cannot simply hold someone indefinitely.
To obtain additional detention time, investigators must convince a magistrate that further remand is necessary for the investigation.
The court will consider factors such as:
- Whether police still need more time to gather evidence
- Whether further questioning is required
- Whether there is a risk that the person could interfere with witnesses or evidence
- Whether continued detention is justified based on the available facts
If the magistrate is not satisfied that further detention is necessary, the remand application can be rejected.
Why was the driver released?
Authorities have not publicly disclosed the magistrate's detailed reasons for rejecting the remand application.
However, information released so far suggests investigators had already obtained the driver's statement and completed key initial procedures.
Police also said:
- The driver tested negative for drugs
- He possessed a valid driving licence
- Preliminary investigations indicated the lorry was travelling at around 60kph
- There was no indication at this stage that he was speeding
While the driver has seven traffic summonses on record, four of them unpaid, traffic summonses alone do not automatically justify continued detention in an unrelated crash investigation.
Does this mean the driver has been cleared?
No.
The rejection of a remand application is not a finding that the driver was innocent, nor does it mean the case is closed.
Police are still investigating the circumstances surrounding the collision.
Investigators are examining all available evidence to determine how the crash occurred, including the movements of both vehicles before impact.
Authorities have also said the Proton X50 involved in the crash will undergo a comprehensive inspection at Puspakom as part of the investigation.
What happened in the crash?
The collision occurred on 7 June along Jalan Kampung Baru Pinang Tunggal in Kedah.
Six people travelling in a Proton X50 were killed, while a three-year-old girl was the sole survivor and remains in critical condition.
Police previously said preliminary investigations found that the SUV had entered the opposite lane before colliding with the oncoming lorry, although the reason for this has yet to be determined.
As investigations continue, police are expected to rely on vehicle inspections, witness statements, forensic findings and other evidence before deciding whether any further action is warranted.
